THE OFFICIAL GUIDE TO KNOWING
WHEN MUSIC IS 'GOOD'.

Music is bad when :
A) It is not famous.
![]()
All good music is famous, but even famous music is not good if :
![]()
![]()
1) You have not yet found out that it is indeed famous.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Although all famous (and therefore good) music was at one time not famous,
![]()
![]()
![]()
all music that is not yet famous is bad because :
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
A) No one will like you if you like such music.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
B) No one will remember or care that you liked the
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
product before it became well-known.
![]()
![]()
2) It was produced by someone who has made famous music
![]()
![]()
![]()
only once before, i.e., a loathsome 'one hit wonder'.
![]()
![]()
3) It is famous but it serves no purpose for you to announce that you like it.
Music is good when :
A) It is famous. (with the above mentioned caveats)
![]()
As the caveats above clearly state, it is an error in judgment to consider
![]()
any other factors in your assessment of musical viability. However, as a guide
![]()
to those with special circumstances, several inadvisable options for good music
![]()
are listed below only to show them as the best of the faulty reasons why a given
![]()
music product might be considered good, in an attempt to minimize the damage done
![]()
to those individuals who, for whatever reason, must ignore the facts.
![]()
![]()
B) It is liked by an individual with whom you are enamored.
![]()
![]()
C) If, by liking it, you can 'be somebody', but :
![]()
![]()
![]()
You are delusional if you erroneously announce that you like any non-famous
![]()
![]()
![]()
music in an attempt to 'be somebody', or to enhance any feelings of
![]()
![]()
![]()
individualism-through-unique-preference, or to impress others
![]()
![]()
![]()
through any intrinsically pretentious exhibition of supposed
![]()
![]()
![]()
artistic knowledge or extraordinarily up-to-date fashion awareness.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Although in some circles, both of the
![]()
![]()
![]()
elitist, art-ratbag variety and in ignorant, educationally-challenged,
![]()
![]()
![]()
teenage purulent factions, this will actually have a momentary socially-positive effect,
![]()
![]()
![]()
the cumulative return on this modality of behavior will be negative.
![]()
![]()
D) It is part of a multi-media presentation such as a movie
![]()
![]()
![]()
or a television program. The value-added relevance of this music
![]()
![]()
![]()
in particular depends very heavily on psychological associations and
![]()
![]()
![]()
contrasts, such as familiarity / strangeness and past usage of thematic
![]()
![]()
![]()
material reflected against the content of the immediate presentation,
![]()
![]()
![]()
which, by its visual nature, is far more powerful than sound.
![]()
![]()
![]()
The individuals who do this are recklessly toying around at the very fringes
![]()
![]()
![]()
of sanity in a stunningly vain belief that their experience is at all
![]()
![]()
![]()
pertinent to the experiences of masses of humanity in a global marketplace.
![]()
![]()
![]()
In addition, film music, although it has over the decades evolved
![]()
![]()
![]()
into an acceptable formula method of incidental auditory accompaniment, is
![]()
![]()
![]()
a very distant second to all other parts of the product in value. It lacks even the
![]()
![]()
![]()
souvenir value of props and other motion picture memorabilia because
![]()
![]()
![]()
it has no physical form, and should be discarded after use in the same
![]()
![]()
![]()
way that the artificial cardboard walls of the movie set are disposed of.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Without the visual part of the film, its music is almost always irrelevant
![]()
![]()
![]()
and worthless as a viable stand-alone product. Again, only if it becomes
![]()
![]()
![]()
famous does it become good music.
![]()
![]()
E) Its usage enhances your customer's shopping experience and will potentially
![]()
![]()
![]()
be a revenue-positive tool in your marketing arsenal.
Additional concerns :
![]()
Although most famous music will very soon become passe',
![]()
and even though the stigma of being associated with obsolescence
![]()
or un-stylish products or services is a detriment to be considered
![]()
as a factor in the judgment of any responsible individual, music is
![]()
a consumable product, and you are a consumer. The burden of recovery
![]()
from the onus of association with it is outweighed by the potential payoffs
![]()
of the utilization of the currently-famous product in social endeavors.
![]()
This can be exemplified in the examination of the cost/benefit ratio of
![]()
any involvement at all in music acquisition and usage.
![]()
Fundamentally, expenditures for music acquisition must be considered to be
![]()
of a maintenance and transitory nature, as must be expenditures
![]()
for fashion, food, cigarettes and waste disposal products.
Addendum 2005 :
![]()
All of these expediture concerns have become obsolete as of the late 1990's.
![]()
The acquisition of music is now universally accomplished without cost
![]()
through the exploitation of peer to peer computer networks, and a new paradigm
![]()
has been established in which any purchase of music product is stupid.
![]()
Music is now "good" (momentarily) when it is famous to micro-targeted consumers
![]()
or acquiatances and when it can be used as a tool in the manipulation of behavior or purchasing activity.
![]()
Otherwise it is absolutely useless and pathetic trash, and those who produce it are hurtling
![]()
directly into the abyss and to an inevitable collision with oblivion, madness and eternal sorrow.